All Cannabis Legislation
HF 2104
🟡 In Committee
House

Billboard Ad Ban Lift

Would eliminate Minnesota's current ban on cannabis billboard advertising, allowing dispensaries and cannabis brands to promote their products on roadside billboards.

Last updated: Apr 2, 2025 ·  94th Legislature, 2025-2026 Session

Plain-English Overview

HF2104 would repeal Minnesota's prohibition on cannabis billboard advertising. Right now, cannabis businesses in Minnesota are banned from using billboards to promote their products, even though the products they sell are completely legal. Representative Jim Nash, a Republican, introduced the bill with DFL co-author Dan Wolgamott, making this a bipartisan effort to give cannabis businesses the same advertising options available to alcohol companies, restaurants, and other legal businesses that routinely use billboard advertising.

If passed, dispensaries, cannabis brands, and other licensed businesses would be able to purchase billboard space to advertise their products, locations, and brand identity. The bill specifically eliminates the billboard prohibition - it does not override other advertising regulations that may still apply, such as rules against marketing to minors or making health claims. Cannabis businesses would still need to comply with all other applicable advertising standards set by the Office of Cannabis Management.

This bill sits at the intersection of free speech, public health, and business fairness. Supporters argue it is fundamentally unfair to sell legal products but ban businesses from advertising them through mainstream channels. Opponents worry about the visibility and reach of billboards, which are seen by everyone including children and cannot be opted out of the way digital ads can. The outcome of this debate will shape how visible cannabis becomes in Minnesota's physical landscape.

Key Dates

Introduced

Mar 10, 2025

Last Action

Apr 2, 2025

Committee Deadline

Mar/Apr 2026

Session Ends

May 2026

Key Provisions

  • Repeals the existing prohibition on cannabis advertising on billboards
  • Allows licensed cannabis businesses to purchase billboard advertising space
  • Maintains other existing advertising regulations and restrictions that apply to cannabis
  • Does not create new advertising rights beyond billboard access
  • Applies to all forms of billboard and outdoor advertising currently prohibited under the cannabis statute

Who Wants What

Supporters Say

  • +It is fundamentally unfair to legalize a product but then ban businesses from advertising it through the same channels available to alcohol companies, car dealers, and fast food chains
  • +Billboard advertising helps consumers find licensed dispensaries instead of turning to unregulated or illegal sources, which serves the state's interest in a well-functioning legal market
  • +The current billboard ban is arguably a First Amendment issue - restricting commercial speech for a legal product raises constitutional concerns that other states have already grappled with

Opponents Say

  • -Billboards are unavoidable - unlike digital ads, you cannot skip or block them, meaning children, recovering addicts, and people who do not want cannabis marketing in their lives are forced to see it
  • -Lifting the billboard ban could normalize cannabis use in a way that undermines public health messaging, particularly for youth who are exposed to roadside advertising every day
  • -Alcohol billboard advertising has been linked to increased drinking in studies, and there is reason to believe cannabis billboards would similarly increase consumption, particularly among vulnerable populations

Impact Analysis

🏠

Consumers & Public

Consumers would see cannabis advertising alongside other products on Minnesota's roadways. This could help people find nearby dispensaries and learn about products, but it also means cannabis marketing becomes a more visible part of daily life whether consumers want it or not.

🏪

Businesses

This would open a major new marketing channel for cannabis businesses. Billboard advertising is particularly valuable for dispensaries that rely on location-based traffic. Larger companies with bigger advertising budgets would likely benefit most, though local billboard rates vary widely and can be affordable for smaller operations.

💰

Taxpayers

No direct fiscal impact on taxpayers. Billboard advertising revenue would flow to billboard companies and their landowners. If billboard ads drive more legal cannabis sales, the state could see modest increases in cannabis tax revenue.

⚖️

Legal & Enforcement

The Office of Cannabis Management would need to clarify what rules still apply to cannabis billboard content - for example, restrictions on targeting minors, making health claims, or using certain imagery. Local governments may also weigh in on billboard placement near schools or other sensitive locations.

Historical Context

Cannabis advertising law is a patchwork across the United States. Colorado allows billboard advertising but restricts it near schools and requires that at least 71.6% of the audience be adults. California allows billboards but not within 1,000 feet of schools, daycares, or playgrounds. Oregon bans most outdoor cannabis advertising entirely. The debate mirrors the long history of alcohol and tobacco advertising regulation, where the balance between commercial speech and public health has been contested for decades. Minnesota's current billboard ban is relatively strict compared to most legal cannabis states.

Legislative Timeline

Introduction Committee Floor / Amendment Passed / Signed Failed / Vetoed
  1. House

    Introduction and first reading, referred to Commerce Finance and Policy

    Latest statusWatch/listen to committee hearing
  2. House

    Author added Wolgamott

Likely next steps

  1. TBD

    Committee hearing and amendment process

  2. TBD

    Committee vote - move to full chamber

  3. TBD

    Floor debate and chamber vote

  4. TBD

    Conference committee (if both chambers pass different versions)

  5. TBD

    Governor signature or veto

Sponsors

R

Jim Nash

Author - Republican

Co-sponsors (1)

DDan Wolgamott(Co-Author)

Frequently Asked Questions

Get Involved

This bill is still working through the legislature. Here is how you can make your voice heard.

Contact Your Rep

Find and contact your Minnesota legislators about this bill.

Find Your Legislators

Read the Bill

Read the official bill text on the MN Revisor website.

Official Bill Text

Stay Updated

Subscribe to the MN Cannabis Hub newsletter for bill updates.

Subscribe for Updates

Share This Page

Help others follow this bill by sharing this page.

Research This Bill With AI

Use AI assistants to get plain-English breakdowns of this bill. Each button opens a pre-written research prompt - our site URL is included so AI citations point back to MN Cannabis Hub.

G
Ask ChatGPT

Get a simple explanation of what this bill does and who it affects.

Ask ChatGPT
P
Ask Perplexity

Research supporters, opponents, and real-world effects with sources cited.

Ask Perplexity
C
Ask Claude

Deep analysis: fiscal impact, comparisons to other states, arguments for and against.

View the prompts being sent

ChatGPT prompt:

Summarize Minnesota bill HF2104 "Billboard Ad Ban Lift" and its impact on citizens, businesses, and the cannabis industry. Explain it like I'm 10 years old. Use https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/HF2104 as a reference source.

Perplexity prompt:

What is Minnesota bill HF2104 "Billboard Ad Ban Lift"? What does it do, who supports and opposes it, and how will it affect Minnesota cannabis consumers and businesses? Cite https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/HF2104

Claude prompt (copy and paste):

Analyze Minnesota cannabis bill HF2104 "Billboard Ad Ban Lift". Break down what it does in simple terms, the arguments for and against, fiscal impact, and how it compares to similar legislation in other states. Reference: https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/HF2104