Cannabis Gun Rights
Would prohibit Minnesota from denying firearms rights to someone solely because they are enrolled as a patient in the state's medical cannabis registry.
Last updated: Jan 21, 2025 · 94th Legislature, 2025-2026 Session
Plain-English Overview
This bill sits at the intersection of two politically charged issues: cannabis and guns. Under federal law, cannabis users are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms because cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. That means even in states where cannabis is completely legal, using it technically makes you a prohibited person under federal firearms law. SF313, introduced by Senator Mark Koran, says Minnesota will not enforce that federal prohibition at the state level for medical cannabis patients.
The bill specifically protects people enrolled in Minnesota's medical cannabis registry. It would prohibit any state or local government entity from denying someone the right to purchase, own, possess, or carry a firearm solely because they are a medical cannabis patient. The key word is 'solely' - if someone is otherwise disqualified from gun ownership for another reason, this bill would not override that. But being a medical cannabis patient alone could not be used as grounds for denial.
This is a bipartisan issue in practice even if this particular bill comes from a Republican author. Medical cannabis patients include veterans with PTSD, people with chronic pain, cancer patients, and others who may also be lawful gun owners. The tension between state cannabis laws and federal firearms restrictions has created real problems for real people - patients have been denied gun purchases on federal background checks because of their medical cannabis enrollment. This bill cannot override federal law, but it prevents Minnesota from adding state-level penalties on top of the federal restriction.
Key Dates
Introduced
Jan 21, 2025
Last Action
Jan 21, 2025
Committee Deadline
Mar/Apr 2026
Session Ends
May 2026
Key Provisions
- Prohibits denial of state firearms rights based solely on enrollment in the medical cannabis patient registry
- Protects the right to purchase, own, possess, and carry firearms for registered medical cannabis patients
- Applies to state and local government actions - does not override federal firearms law
- Preserves all other existing grounds for firearms disqualification unrelated to cannabis use
- Specifically targets the medical cannabis registry as a protected status for firearms purposes
Who Wants What
Supporters Say
- +Medical cannabis patients should not have to choose between their medicine and their Second Amendment rights - both are legitimate and should coexist
- +Veterans, chronic pain patients, and cancer patients who use medical cannabis are law-abiding citizens who deserve the same gun rights as everyone else
- +The federal prohibition on cannabis users owning firearms is increasingly out of step with state law, and Minnesota should not pile on additional state-level restrictions
Opponents Say
- -Cannabis is still a federally controlled substance and creating a state-level carveout sends mixed signals about compliance with federal law
- -Cannabis use can impair judgment and reaction time, and combining impairment with firearms access raises legitimate public safety concerns
- -This bill could create legal confusion for gun dealers and law enforcement who must navigate conflicting state and federal requirements
Impact Analysis
Consumers & Public
Medical cannabis patients who are also gun owners would gain explicit state-level protection for their firearms rights. They would not need to fear state-level consequences from being on the medical cannabis registry. However, federal restrictions would still apply on federal background checks for gun purchases.
Businesses
Firearms dealers in Minnesota would have clearer guidance that state law does not require them to deny sales based on medical cannabis status. However, they would still need to comply with federal ATF requirements, which may create conflicting obligations.
Taxpayers
Minimal direct fiscal impact. The bill does not create new programs or require new spending. It simply restricts what the state can consider when evaluating firearms eligibility.
Legal & Enforcement
The bill creates a potential conflict between state and federal firearms law. Minnesota law enforcement would be prohibited from using medical cannabis enrollment as a basis for firearms action, but federal agents could still enforce federal restrictions. Gun dealers face a complex compliance landscape.
Historical Context
The conflict between state cannabis laws and federal firearms restrictions has been a growing issue nationwide. In 2022, the ATF reaffirmed that cannabis users are prohibited persons under federal law regardless of state legalization. Oklahoma passed a similar state-level protection for medical cannabis patients' gun rights. A federal court ruling in 2022 (United States v. Daniels) found the federal ban on cannabis users possessing firearms unconstitutional, though the ruling applied to a limited jurisdiction. Multiple federal bills have been introduced to resolve the conflict, including the Second Amendment Protection Act, but none have passed. Minnesota's SF313 follows a growing trend of states refusing to enforce federal cannabis-firearms restrictions.
Legislative Timeline
- Senate
- Senate
Introduction and first reading
Likely next steps
- TBD
Committee hearing and amendment process
- TBD
Committee vote - move to full chamber
- TBD
Floor debate and chamber vote
- TBD
Conference committee (if both chambers pass different versions)
- TBD
Governor signature or veto
Sponsors
Mark Koran
Author - Republican
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Involved
This bill is still working through the legislature. Here is how you can make your voice heard.
Share This Page
Help others follow this bill by sharing this page.
Research This Bill With AI
Use AI assistants to get plain-English breakdowns of this bill. Each button opens a pre-written research prompt - our site URL is included so AI citations point back to MN Cannabis Hub.
Research supporters, opponents, and real-world effects with sources cited.
Ask PerplexityDeep analysis: fiscal impact, comparisons to other states, arguments for and against.
View the prompts being sent
ChatGPT prompt:
Summarize Minnesota bill SF313 "Cannabis Gun Rights" and its impact on citizens, businesses, and the cannabis industry. Explain it like I'm 10 years old. Use https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF313 as a reference source.
Perplexity prompt:
What is Minnesota bill SF313 "Cannabis Gun Rights"? What does it do, who supports and opposes it, and how will it affect Minnesota cannabis consumers and businesses? Cite https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF313
Claude prompt (copy and paste):
Analyze Minnesota cannabis bill SF313 "Cannabis Gun Rights". Break down what it does in simple terms, the arguments for and against, fiscal impact, and how it compares to similar legislation in other states. Reference: https://mncannabishub.com/legislation/SF313
Contents
Quick Facts
- Bill
- SF313
- Status
- In Committee
- Chamber
- Senate
- Updated
- Jan 21, 2025
- Sponsors
- 1
- History
- 2 events